del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
& http://www.lewrockwell.com
The US House of Representatives has joined Hillary Clinton, Obama, the neoconservatives, Washington’s vassals, and the American and European presstitutes in demonizing Russia and President Putin. The House resolution against Russia is a packet of lies, but that did not stop the resolution from passing by a vote of 411 for and 10 against.
The entire world should take note that the American people are capable of electing only ten intelligent representatives. Ten people out of 435 is 2 percent. And yet Washington declares itself to be the “exceptional,” “indispensable” country empowered to exercise hegemony over the world!
No one should be surprised to see Washington, its presstitutes and European vassal states using the same propagandistic lies against Russia and Putin as were used against Iraq and Saddam Hussein, Libya and Gaddafi, Syria and Assad, Afghanistan and the Taliban, and Iran. Washington is fearful of the rise of Russia and China, of the leadership demonstrated by Vladimir Putin, of the formation of new organizations independent of Washington, such as the BRICS. While the George W. Bush regime was sidetracked by its “six week, $70 billion war,” which turned out to be, so far, a multi-trillion dollar 13-year losing operation, Putin kicked out some of the American agents who were contaminating Russian sovereignty and rebuilt the country.
When Putin blocked the planned US invasions of Syria and Iran, Washington decided that something had to be done about Putin and Russia. Washington had spent $5 billion dollars buying Ukrainian politicians and funding fifth column NGOs. With Putin distracted with the Olympics, Washington struck, overthrew the elected Ukrainian government and installed its puppets.
The puppets set about antagonizing Ukraine’s Russian population in provinces that formerly were part of Russia but were attached to Ukraine by Soviet leaders when Russia and Ukraine were the same country. Russians threatened with death and the banning of their language naturally did not want to be victims of Washington’s puppet government in Kiev. Crimea voted to reunite with Russia from whence it came, and so did the eastern and southern provinces.
Washington and its the vassals and presstitutes lied and described these acts of self-determination as Russian invasion and annexation. Russia is falsely accused of having troops occupying the breakaway provinces.
The purpose of Washington’s false accusations is to destabilize Russia and the country’s government. Washington has many avenues by which to destabilize Russia. Washington has the US funded NGOs, the foreign owned Russian media, and the House Resolution calls for Washington to expand propaganda broadcasting into Russia in the Russian language. Washington has cultivated oligarchs, business interests and Russian politicians who see their economic and political interests aligned with the West. There are deluded Russian youths who think freedom resides in the West and others represented by such as Pussy Riot who prefer the West’s amoralism or immoralism to the Christian culture that the Russian government supports.
If Washington fails to destabilize Russia or to have Putin assassinated, frustration could result in more reckless behavior that could lead to military conflict. The House Resolution calls on Obama to arm Ukraine with US weapons so that Ukraine can conquer the separatist provinces and take back Crimea. There are constant calls from NATO itself for more military forces on Russia’s borders, and NATO war games are conducted near Russia’s borders. Washington wants to include the former Russian provinces of Georgia and Ukraine in NATO, something that Russia cannot accept.
Washington is placing the world on the path to Armageddon, as Professor Michel Chossudovsky makes clear in “Towards A World War III Scenario” (Global Research, 2012).
The Russian government downplays the dangers and continues to speak of “our Western partners,” with whom the Russian government hopes to work things out. The Russian government and the Russian people–indeed all the peoples of the earth–should understand that Russia has no partners in the West. Russia only has enemies.
Washington has made it completely clear that Russia can be part of the West only as a vassal state and not as a sovereign country with its own interests and an independent policy. Washington’s demand for hegemony does not permit the existence of other sovereign countries sufficiently strong to resist Washington’s will. As the ideology of hegemony has a powerful hold on Washington and is institutionalized in the neoconservative control of critical government offices and media, war is the almost certain outcome.
Washington’s puppet rulers of Europe are the enablers of the neoconservative war-mongers. In all of Europe there is not a government independent of Washington. Pawns like Merkel, Cameron, and Hollande are selling out human life.
Russian government officials, such as Putin and Lavrov, address the facts, but to Washington and its European vassals facts are not important. What is important is to destabilize Russia. The conflict that Washington has brought to Russia cannot be addressed on a factual basis.
Washington knew that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction and no al Qaeda connections. Washington knew Assad did not use chemical weapons. Washington knew that Gaddafi was being set up with lies. Washington knows that Iran has no nuclear weapons. What was important to Washington was not the truth but the overthrow of these governments.
While the Russian government was preoccupied with the olympics, Washington struck in Ukraine, installing a puppet government. It is likely the case that the only solution that can make the festering problem of Ukraine go away is the reincorporation of Ukraine in Russia.
Arrogance and hubris usually result in overreach, and overreach could break up Washington’s empire. But Washington doesn’t think so. Just as Washington put its NGOs into the streets of Kiev in what is called the Maiden protests, Washington has put its NGOs in the streets of Hong Kong, hoping that the protests or riots will spread to other Chinese cities.
Russia and China are far too open to the West than is good for them. Tsar Nicholas II did not expect his government to be overthrown, but Kerensky did overthrow Nicholas’ government in the February Revolution only to be overthrown by Lenin in the October Revolution. The Chinese don’t expect to be overthrown, but neither did Viktor Yanukovych.
Political life is full of ambitious persons and agendas. Putin faces these ambitions in Russia. Washington knows that Russia cannot be turned into a vassal state as long as Putin is in office. Therefore, the demonization of Putin and plots against him will continue.
Lev Nikolayevich Gumilev nació el 1 de octubre de 1912 y falleció el 15 de junio de 1992. Su padre fue el poeta acmeísta Nikolai Stepanovich Gumilev y su madre fue Anna Andreiévna Ajmátova. El padre de Lev, Nikolai Stepanovich, era militar de profesión y, como llevamos dicho, poeta; sus posiciones políticas eran monárquicas. Al regresar a Rusia, tras el triunfo de la revolución, Nikolai Gumilev no disimuló el disgusto que le inspiraba el comunismo con todos sus oportunistas, ahora dueños de la situación en el régimen soviético. Fue capturado por la Cheka y ejecutado por los bolcheviques que lo culparon de estar involucrado en el complot monárquico llamado "la conspiración de Tagantsev", ni siquiera las gestiones de Máximo Gorki -que valoraba al joven poeta- pudieron impedir la sentencia inexorable y en 1921 caía frente a un pelotón de fusilamiento. Anna, la esposa del militar caído en desgracia, pudo salvar la vida, pero ser esposa de un "conspirador" y escribir una poesía intimista le valieron la estigmatización. El hijo del matrimonio, Lev, creció al cuidado de una de sus abuelas y cuando fue mayor conoció en propia carne el gulag. Trece años cumplidos en las minas de níquel de Norilsk y otros campos de concentración, sin que haber servido a la Unión Soviética en la toma de Berlín le hubiera servido para mucho.
El libro que le granjeó una popularidad europea, aunque efímera, fue éste que tradujo el canónigo Antonio Sancho Nebot, “Europa y el alma de oriente” (“Europa und die Seele des Ostens”); sin embargo no omitamos que, como filósofo de la cultura, los intereses intelectuales de Schubart abarcaban un amplio abanico, siendo también notable su ensayo “Religion und Eros” (ensayo publicado en Munich el año 1941).
En España ve Schubart un país hermano de Rusia, hermanos en su afinidad por el mesianismo, así puede escribir:
.
La búsqueda de la unidad a todos los niveles, la «unitotalidad», según la expresión acuñada por él, puede considerarse la piedra angular que sostiene y da coherencia a todo el sistema de este pensador absolutamente original, a menudo paradójico y «extraño», imposible de reducir a los esquemas de la cultura académica. Soloviev, que poseía además de extraordinarias dotes intelectuales una profunda sensibilidad poética, contribuyó más que nadie al renacimiento espiritual ruso del siglo XX, y es autor de la creación especulativa más universal de la edad moderna, una obra tan monumental que le valió el apelativo de «santo Tomás de la Iglesia de Oriente». Sin embargo, como subrayaron los ponentes del encuentro, tal unidad no procede, para Soloviev, de un principio abstracto, un universal teórico o ético, sino de la persona viva de Jesucristo, punto fundamental de su vida y de su pensamiento. A esta presencia viva se dirige Soloviev como hacia el amigo más íntimo y querido, «mi Cristo», criterio de todo lo que el hombre piensa y siente y, sin embargo, irreductible tanto a sentimientos subjetivos como a valores o conceptos abstractos, ya que es inseparable de la Iglesia: «Para nosotros Dios no tiene realidad sin Cristo, Dios-hombre; es más, el mismo Cristo dejaría de ser real para nosotros si no fuera más que un recuerdo histórico: es preciso que se nos revele en el presente. Y esta revelación presente debe ser independiente de nuestra limitación individual. Esta realidad de Cristo y de su vida, independiente de nuestros límites personales, nos es dada en la Iglesia».